Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Music Choice v. Stingray Digital Group Inc., No. 2:16-cv-00586 (E.D. Tex. Oct. 24, 2019)

Denied
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:16-cv-00586, Dkt. No. 280
Decided
October 24, 2019
Judge
Roy S. Payne, M.J.
Document
Memorandum Order
Length
12 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Defendants Stingray Digital Group Inc. and Stingray, USA, Inc. (collectively “Stingray”) filed a Daubert Motion to Exclude Certain Opinions and Testimony of Music Choice’s Damages Expert (Dkt. No. 192), which is now before the C ourt. In this motion, Stingray moves to exclude certain opinions and testimony of Dr. Keith R. Ugone. Stingray seeks to exclude (1) Dr.