Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Music Choice v. Stingray Digital Group Inc., No. 2:16-cv-00586 (E.D. Tex. Sept. 6, 2017)

Adopted Report and recommendation (or magistrate's order) adopted
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:16-cv-00586, Dkt. No. 152
Decided
September 6, 2017
Judge
Rodney Gilstrap, J.
Document
Order
Docket Entry
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 119 Report and Recommendations,62 Motion to Dismiss filed by Music Choice
Length
1 page

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

The above entitled and numbered civil action was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Roy S. Payne pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636. Now before the Court is the Report and Recom- mendation (Dkt. No. 119) by Magi strate Judge Payne, which reco mmends that Music Choice’s Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. No. 62) be denied. Neit her party has filed objec tions to the Report and Recommendation. Having considered the Report, IT IS ORDERED that Magistrate Judge Payne’s Report and Recommendation (Dkt. No. 119) is hereby ADOPTED. Music Choice’s Motion to Dismiss (Dkt.