Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

My Health, Inc. v. ALR Technologies, Inc., No. 2:16-cv-00535 (E.D. Tex. Dec. 19, 2017)

Granted
Attorneys' Fees § 101 Eligibility
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:16-cv-00535, Dkt. No. 131
Decided
December 19, 2017
Judge
Roy S. Payne, M.J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER re 81 SEALED MOTION TO DECLARE CASES EXCEPTIONAL AND FOR ATTORNEYS' FEES filed by ALR Technologies, Inc., McKesson Technologies Inc., MyNetDiary, Inc., InTouch Technologies, Inc
Length
14 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

In May 2016, My Health filed a number of patent infringement lawsuits in the district, and about ten months later, t he Court declared the patent-in-suit (U.S. Patent No. 6,612,985) invalid for failure to claim patent- eligible subject matter as required by 35 U.S.C. § 101. Defendants’ motions to dismiss were granted, and f inal judgment was entered.

Download Opinion (PDF)

Source: govinfo.gov USCOURTS collection · retrieved July 23, 2026 · Report an error

Other documents in this case