Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

My Health, Inc. v. ALR Technologies, Inc., No. 2:16-cv-00535 (E.D. Tex. Mar. 27, 2017)

Adopted Report and recommendation (or magistrate's order) adopted
§ 101 Eligibility Motion to Dismiss
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:16-cv-00535, Dkt. No. 78
Decided
March 27, 2017
Judge
Robert W. Schroeder, III, J.
Document
Order
Docket Entry
ORDER ADOPTING 66 and 69 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS; Granting 12 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Personal Jurisdiction, Improper Venue and Failure to State a Claim filed by ALR Technologies, Inc., and 25 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State…
Length
6 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court are two Reports and Recommendations of United States Magistrate Judge Roy S. Payne. The first recommends that Defendant DeVilbiss Healthcare, LLC’s Motion to Dismiss Under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) (Case No. 2:16-cv-544; Docket No. 15) be granted because the claims of asserted U.S. Patent No. 6,612,985 (“the ’985 Patent”) are drawn to ineligible subject Page 2 of 6 matter under 35 U.S.C. § 101. Docket No. 661 (“Rep.”) at 1.

Download Opinion (PDF)

Source: govinfo.gov USCOURTS collection · retrieved July 23, 2026 · Report an error

Other documents in this case