Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Foundation Medicine, Inc. v. Guardant Health, Inc., No. 2:16-cv-00523 (E.D. Tex. Feb. 14, 2017)

Denied
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:16-cv-00523, Dkt. No. 59
Decided
February 14, 2017
Judge
Roy S. Payne, M.J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Length
7 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Guardant Health, Inc. (“Guardant”) moves to transfer this case to the Northern District of California under 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a). Dkt. 12. Because Guardant does not show that the Northern District of California would be clearly more convenient, Guardant’s motion is DENIED. DISCUSSION A district court can transfer a case to another district where the case might have been brought for “the convenience of parties and witnesses” and “in the interests of justice.” 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a).