Packet Intelligence LLC v. NetScout Systems, Inc. et al, No. 2:16-cv-00230 (E.D. Tex. Oct. 16, 2024)

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court are (1) Packet Intelligence’s Motion to be Confirmed as the Prevailing Party Under Federal Rule 54(d) and for Taxable Costs (“Plaintiff’s Motion,” Dkt. No. 436), and (2) Netscout’s Motion for Bill of Costs (“Defendants’ Motion,” Dkt. No. 440). 1 In Plaintiff’s Motion, Plaintiff Packet Intelligence LLC (“Plaintiff”) requests the Court to confirm that it “is the prevailing party under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 54(d) and award[] taxable costs in the amount previously agreed upon by the parties.” (Dkt. No.