Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Packet Intelligence LLC v. NetScout Systems, Inc. et al, No. 2:16-cv-00230 (E.D. Tex. Apr. 15, 2019)

Denied
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:16-cv-00230, Dkt. No. 337
Decided
April 15, 2019
Judge
Rodney Gilstrap, J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER - Motion for A Finding of Exceptional Case and An Award of Attorneys Fees, (Dkt. No. 309), is hereby DENIED
Length
6 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is Plaintiff Packet Intelligence LLC’s Motion for A Finding of Exceptional Case and Award of Attorneys’ Fees (the “Motion”). (Dkt. No. 309.) Having considered the briefing, case record, and relevant authorities, the Court is of the opinion that the Motion should be and hereby is DENIED for the reasons set forth herein. I. BACKGROUND Packet Intelligence LLC (“PI”) sued Defendants NetScout Systems, Inc., Tektronix Communications, and Tektronix Texas, LLC (collectively “NetScout”) for patent infringement on March 15, 2016. (Dkt. No.