Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Personalized Media Communications, LLC v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al, No. 2:15-cv-01754 (E.D. Tex. Oct. 26, 2016)

Claims Construed
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:15-cv-01754, Dkt. No. 110
Decided
October 26, 2016
Judge
Roy S. Payne, M.J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Length
101 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

On September 23, 2016, the Court held a hearing to determine the proper construction of the disputed terms in six patents. The Court has considered the parties’ claim construction briefing (Dkt. Nos. 69, 78, 196 and 83 )1 and arguments. Based on the intrinsic and extrinsic evidence, the Court construes the disputed terms in this Memorandum Opinion and Order. See Phillips v. AWH Corp., 415 F.3d 1303 (Fed. Cir. 2005); Teva Pharm. USA, Inc. v. Sandoz, Inc ., 135 S. Ct. 831 (2015).