Personalized Media Communications, LLC v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al, No. 2:15-cv-01754 (E.D. Tex. Oct. 26, 2016)
From the Opinion
The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.
On September 23, 2016, the Court held a hearing to determine the proper construction of the disputed terms in six patents. The Court has considered the parties’ claim construction briefing (Dkt. Nos. 69, 78, 196 and 83 )1 and arguments. Based on the intrinsic and extrinsic evidence, the Court construes the disputed terms in this Memorandum Opinion and Order. See Phillips v. AWH Corp., 415 F.3d 1303 (Fed. Cir. 2005); Teva Pharm. USA, Inc. v. Sandoz, Inc ., 135 S. Ct. 831 (2015).
Source: govinfo.gov USCOURTS collection · retrieved July 23, 2026 · Report an error