Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Personalized Media Communications, LLC v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al, No. 2:15-cv-01754 (E.D. Tex. Sept. 29, 2016)

Adopted Report and recommendation (or magistrate's order) adopted
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:15-cv-01754, Dkt. No. 102
Decided
September 29, 2016
Judge
Rodney Gilstrap, J.
Document
Report and Recommendation
Docket Entry
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 93 Report and Recommendations
Length
1 page

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is the Report and Recomm endation of Magistrate Judge Payne (Dkt. No. 93) concluding that Samsung’s Rule 12(b)(6) Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim (Dkt. 23) be denied because the asserted patent s are directed to patent-eligible subject matter under 35 U.S.C. § 101. After reviewing the record and the objections de novo, the Court finds that the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation should be ADOPTED. (Dkt. No. 93.) Accordingly, Defendant’s Rule 12(b)(6) Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim (Dkt. No.