Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Rothschild Connected Devices Innovations, LLC v. Guardian Protection Services, Inc., No. 2:15-cv-01431 (E.D. Tex. Nov. 12, 2019)

Denied
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:15-cv-01431, Dkt. No. 140
Decided
November 12, 2019
Judge
Rodney Gilstrap, J.
Document
Order
Docket Entry
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 131 Report and Recommendations the Court DENIES the Motion
Length
2 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

This Court previously entered an Order (Dkt. No. 136) Adopting the Report and Recommendation (Dkt. No. 131) to dismiss this case due to insufficient service of process despite Defendant ADS Security L.P.’s (“ADS”) Objection (Dkt. No. 134) to it. ADS now files a Motion to Reconsider the Order Adopting the Report and Recommendation (“Motion”). (Dkt. No. 137). ADS’ Motion is governed by F ed. R. Civ. P. 59(e). A motion filed within 28 days of judgment, as here, is treated as a motion to alter or amend under Rule 59(e). See Edward H. Bohlin Co. v.