Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Rothschild Connected Devices Innovations, LLC v. Guardian Protection Services, Inc., No. 2:15-cv-01431 (E.D. Tex. July 18, 2016)

Denied
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:15-cv-01431, Dkt. No. 89
Decided
July 18, 2016
Judge
Roy S. Payne, M.J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
***REVERSED, See 95 USCA OPINION***MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
Length
7 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is a Cross -Motion for Attorneys’ Fees (Dkt. No. 59) filed by Defendant ADS Security, LP ( “ADS”) in response to Plaintiff ’s Motion to Dismiss Defendant ADS under Rule 41(a) (Dkt. No. 58). ADS moves “that this case be declared exceptional and for attorneys ’ fees pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 285.” (Dkt. No. 59 at 5). 1 The Court held a hearing on the Motion on March 18, 2016. LEGAL STANDARD Title 35 provides that “ [t]he court in exceptional cases may award reasonable attorney fees to the prevailing party. ” 35 U.S.C. § 285.