Uniloc USA, Inc. et al v. Autodesk, Inc.,, No. 2:15-cv-01187 (E.D. Tex. May 13, 2016)

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

On March 14 and March 15, 2016, Autodesk filed two Petitions 1 for covered business method review of the asserted claims of the patents -in-suit2 pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 321 et seq. and Section 18 of the AIA. See (Dkt. Nos. 38- 5, 38-6). The PTAB has not rend ered institution decisions on Autodesk’s Petitions, which remain pending. On March 18, 2016 Autodesk filed a Motion to Stay Litigation Pendin g CBM Review. (Dkt. No. 38; “Motion to Stay ”). Plaintiffs Uniloc USA, Inc. and Uniloc Luxembourg, S.A. (collectively “Uniloc”) oppose the Motion to Stay.