Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

SSL Services, LLC vs. Cisco Systems, Inc., No. 2:15-cv-00433 (E.D. Tex. Feb. 24, 2016)

Denied
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:15-cv-00433, Dkt. No. 87
Decided
February 24, 2016
Judge
Roy S. Payne, M.J.
Document
Memorandum Order
Length
17 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is a Motion to Transfer Venue to the District of Massachusetts filed by Defendant Cisco Systems, Inc. (“ Cisco”). (Dkt. No. 23; “Motion to Transfer”). Also before the Court is Cisco’s Motion to Compel Amended Infringement Contentions and to Modify the Docket Control Order. (Dkt. No. 51; “Motion to Compel”). I. BACKGROUND This is a patent infringement case brought by SSL Services, LLC (“SSL”) against Cisco, alleging infringement of U.S. Patent No. 6,158,011 (the “’011 Patent”).