Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

SyncPoint Imaging, LLC v. Nintendo of America Inc. et al, No. 2:15-cv-00247 (E.D. Tex. Dec. 26, 2018)

Granted in Part
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:15-cv-00247, Dkt. No. 370
Decided
December 26, 2018
Judge
Roy S. Payne, M.J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Length
12 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

On September 5, 2018, Karl Hansen and his attorney Joseph G. Pia appeared before the Court in response to an order to show cause why sanctions should not be imposed under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 11, 28 U.S.C. § 1927, or the Court’s inherent powers. Pia included certain statements shown to be materially untruthful in the August 10, 2015 declaration prepared for Hansen and relied upon in Plaintiff’s memorandum in opposition to Nintendo’s venue motion. [Dkt. No. 363]. After considering Pia’s response to the show cause order [Dkt. No.