Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

SyncPoint Imaging, LLC v. Nintendo of America Inc. et al, No. 2:15-cv-00247 (E.D. Tex. Jan. 5, 2016)

Claims Construed
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:15-cv-00247, Dkt. No. 230
Decided
January 5, 2016
Judge
Roy S. Payne, M.J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Length
50 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is the opening claim construction brief of SyncPoint Imaging, LLC (“Plaintiff”) (Dkt. No. 143, filed on September 18, 2015), 1 the corrected response of Nintendo of America Inc., Nintendo Co., Ltd., and PixArt Imaging, Inc. (“Defendants”) (Dkt. No. 156, filed on October 6, 2015), joined by Game XChange (Dkt. No. 177) and Games2Go (Dkt. No. 178), and the reply of Plaintiff (Dkt. No. 164, filed on October 9, 2015). The Court held a hearing on the issues of claim construction and indefiniteness on October 30, 2015.