iFLY Holdings LLC vs. Indoor Skydiving Germany GmbH, No. 2:14-cv-01080 (E.D. Tex. Nov. 5, 2015)

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is Defendant Indoor Skydiving Germany GmbH’s Objection to the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge (Dkt. No. 72, filed October 16, 2015.) The Magistrate Judge’s Report recommended that Defendant’s Rule 12(b)(2) Motion to Dismiss for Lack o f Personal Jurisdiction and/or Transfer be denied as to Defendant’s Rule 12(b)(2) Motion to Dismiss. After reviewing the objected to portions of the Report and Recommendation de novo, the Court finds that the Report and Recommendation should be ADOPTED. (See Dkt. No.