iFLY Holdings LLC vs. Indoor Skydiving Germany GmbH, No. 2:14-cv-01080 (E.D. Tex. Oct. 7, 2015)

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Pending before the Court is Defendant Indoor Skydiving Germany GMBH’s (“ISG”) Rule 12(b)(2) Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Personal Jurisdiction and, Alternatively, to Transfer Venue Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a) . (Doc. No. 21.) ISG contends that this case should be transferred to the District of Arizona. Plaintiff iFLY Holdings LLC (“iFLY”) opposes transfer . The Court has considered all the factors and weighed all the evidence and finds that transfer is not warranted. BACKGROUND iFLY has its principal place of business in Austin, Texas . (Doc. No.