Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Core Wireless Licensing S.a.r.l. v. LG Electronics, Inc. et al, No. 2:14-cv-00912 (E.D. Tex. Apr. 1, 2020)

Granted in Part
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:14-cv-00912, Dkt. No. 168
Decided
April 1, 2020
Judge
Rodney Gilstrap, J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER re 132 MOTION for Bill of Costs [Contested] Bill of Costs
Length
9 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is Core Wireless Licensing, S.a.r.l.’s (“Core Wireless”) Motion for Entry of Its [Contested] Bill of Costs (“the Motion”). (Dkt. No. 132). Having considered the Motion, the Court finds it should be and hereby is GRANTED-IN-PART and DENIED-IN-PART. I. BACKGROUND On September 26, 2014, Core Wireless filed suit against Defendants LG Electronics, Inc. and LG Electronics U.S.A., Inc. (collectively, “LG”), alleging infringement of several patents . It proceeded to trial asserting U.S. Patent No. 6,633,536 (“the ’536 Patent”) and U.S.