Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Core Wireless Licensing S.a.r.l. v. LG Electronics, Inc. et al, No. 2:14-cv-00912 (E.D. Tex. Mar. 26, 2020)

Denied
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:14-cv-00912, Dkt. No. 167
Decided
March 26, 2020
Judge
Rodney Gilstrap, J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION and ORDER re 139 MOTION for Attorney Fees AND EXPERT WITNESS FEES
Length
9 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is the Motion for Attorneys’ Fees and Expert Witness Fees (“the Motion”) filed by Plaintiff Core Wireless Licensing S.a.r. l. (“Core Wireless”) . (Dkt. No. 139). Having considered the Motion, the Court finds it should be and hereby is DENIED. I. BACKGROUND A. Procedural History On September 26, 2014, Core Wireless filed suit against Defendants LG Electronics, Inc. and LG Electronics U.S.A., Inc. (collectively, “LG”), alleging infringement of several patents including U.S. Patent No. 6,633,536 (“the ’536 Patent”) and U.S. Patent No.