Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

BMC Software, Inc. v. ServiceNow, Inc., No. 2:14-cv-00903 (E.D. Tex. Feb. 1, 2016)

Granted in Part
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:14-cv-00903, Dkt. No. 328
Decided
February 1, 2016
Judge
Rodney Gilstrap, J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Length
9 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court are certain motions concer ning expert testimony: (1) BMC’s Motion to Strike the Expert Report of Tim Crawford (Dkt. No. 224); and (2) ServiceNow’s Motion to Exclude the Testimony of Dr. Michael P. Akemann (Dkt. No. 237). The Court directed the parties to submit comp lete copies of each expert report, which have subsequently been reviewed by the Court. (Dkt. No. 240). The Court held a hearing on these motions on January 25, 2016. (Dkt. No.