Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

BMC Software, Inc. v. ServiceNow, Inc., No. 2:14-cv-00903 (E.D. Tex. Jan. 29, 2016)

Granted in Part
Daubert / Expert Challenges Motion to Strike
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:14-cv-00903, Dkt. No. 325
Decided
January 29, 2016
Judge
Rodney Gilstrap, J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Length
7 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court are a number of motions concerning expert testimony: (1) BMC’s Motion to Strike and Exclude Opinions of ServiceNow’s Technical Cons ultants Contrary to Court’s Claim Constructions (D kt. No. 226); (2) ServiceNow’s Motion to Strike Expert Testimony of Dr. Mark Jones (Dkt. No. 232); (3) ServiceNow’s Motion to Strike Expert Testimony of Dr. Hugh Smith (Dkt . No. 234); (4) BMC’s Motion to Strike the Expert Report of Tim Crawford (Dkt. No. 224); (5) BMC’s Motion to Strike Expert Reports of Dr. Keller, Dr. Weissman, Dr. Greenberg, and Mr.

Download Opinion (PDF)

Source: govinfo.gov USCOURTS collection · retrieved July 23, 2026 · Report an error

Other documents in this case