Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

SynQor Inc. v. Vicor Corporation, No. 2:14-cv-00287 (E.D. Tex. Aug. 11, 2022)

Adopted Report and recommendation (or magistrate's order) adopted
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:14-cv-00287, Dkt. No. 515
Decided
August 11, 2022
Judge
Robert W. Schroeder, III, J.
Document
Order
Docket Entry
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re: 366 Report and Recommendation. ORDERED that Vicors Motion for Summary Judgment of Non- infringement (Docket No. 334) is DENIED, and Vicors objections (Docket No. 370) are OVERRULED. It is furthe…
Length
10 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

The above civil action was referred to Magistrate Judge Craven pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636. On May 25, 2022, she issued a Report and Recommendation, recommending Vicor Corporation’s (“Vicor”) Motion for Summary Judgment of Non -Infringement (Docket No. 334) be denied. See Docket No. 366 (“R&R”). Vicor filed objections to the R&R (Docket No. 370) pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and L.R. CV -72(b), and SynQor, Inc. (“SynQor”) filed a response to Vicor’s Objections (Docket No. 374).