Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

DSS Technology Management Inc. v. Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company, Ltd. et al, No. 2:14-cv-00199 (E.D. Tex. Oct. 13, 2016)

Granted in Part
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:14-cv-00199, Dkt. No. 231
Decided
October 13, 2016
Judge
Roy S. Payne, M.J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Length
15 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

This matter comes to the Court upon the part ies joint request (Dkt. No. 222) to lift the stay in this case to resolve Samsung’s pendi ng Motion for Attorneys’ Fees under 35 U.S.C. § 285 (Dkt. No. 192) and Samsung’s Motion for Entr y of Bill of Costs pursuant to 29 U.S.C. § 1920 (Dkt. No. 196). With the app eal that justified the Court’s stay now resolved, the Court hereby LIFTS the stay to resolve the parties’ re maining disputes.