E2E Processing Inc v. Cabela's Incorporated, No. 2:14-cv-00036 (E.D. Tex. Oct. 25, 2016)
From the Opinion
The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.
Before the Court is Defendant Cabela’s Incorporated’s (“Cabela’s”) Motion for Attorneys’ and Experts’ Fees (Dkt. No. 137, “Cabela’s Fee Motion”), which was responded to by Plaintiff E2E Processing, Inc.’s (“E2E”) in an Opposition (Dkt. No. 141), which was in turn responded to by Cabela’s Reply in Support of Its Motion for Attorneys’ and Experts’ Fees (Dkt. No. 143). For the following reasons, the Court DENIES Cabela’s Fee Motion (Dkt. No. 137).
Source: govinfo.gov USCOURTS collection · retrieved July 23, 2026 · Report an error