Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

E2E Processing Inc v. Cabela's Incorporated, No. 2:14-cv-00036 (E.D. Tex. July 2, 2015)

Claims Construed
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:14-cv-00036, Dkt. No. 123
Decided
July 2, 2015
Judge
Roy S. Payne, M.J.
Document
Order
Length
31 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

On May 8, 2015, the Court held a hearing to determine the proper construction of the disputed claim terms in United States Patent No. 6,981,222. After considering the arguments made by the parties at the hearing and in the parties’ claim construction briefing (Dkt. Nos. 77, 83 & 85),1 as well as after considering the June 17, 2015 Notice of Supplemental Authority filed by Defendant Cabela’s Incorporated (Dkt. No. 114), the Court issues this Claim Construction Memorandum and Order.