Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Phoenix Licensing, L.L.C. et al v. AAA Life Insurance Company, No. 2:13-cv-01081 (E.D. Tex. June 22, 2015)

Claims Construed
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:13-cv-01081, Dkt. No. 499
Decided
June 22, 2015
Judge
Roy S. Payne, M.J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Length
35 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

On June 4, 2015, the Court held a second hearing to determine the proper construction of the disputed claim terms in United States Patent Nos. 5,987,434 (“the ‘434 Patent”); 6,999,938 (“the ‘938 Patent”); 7,856,375 (“the ‘375 Patent”); 7,860,744 (“the ‘744 Patent”); 7,890,366 (“the ‘366 Patent”); 8,234,184 (“the ‘184 Patent”); 8,352,317 (“the ‘317 Patent”); 8,606,632 (“the ‘632 Patent”); 8,719,114 (“the ‘114 Patent”); and 8,738,435 (“the ‘435 Patent”) (collectively, the “Asserted Patents”).