Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Phoenix Licensing, L.L.C. et al v. AAA Life Insurance Company, No. 2:13-cv-01081 (E.D. Tex. Apr. 20, 2015)

Claims Construed
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:13-cv-01081, Dkt. No. 444
Decided
April 20, 2015
Judge
Roy S. Payne, M.J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Length
109 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

On April 10, 2015, the Court held a hearing to determine the proper construction of the disputed claim terms in United States Patent Nos. 5,987,434 (“the ‘434 Patent”); 6,999,938 (“the ‘938 Patent”); 7,856,375 (“the ‘375 Patent ”); 7,860,744 (“the ‘744 Pa tent”); 7,890,366 (“the ‘366 Patent”); 8,234,184 (“the ‘184 Patent ”); 8,352,317 (“the ‘317 Pa tent”); 8,606,632 (“the ‘632 Patent”); 8,719,114 (“the ‘114 Patent”); and 8,738,435 (“the ‘435 Patent”) (collectively, the “Asserted Patents”).