Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Mobile Telecommunications Technologies, LLC v. LG Electronics Mobilecomm U.S.A., Inc., No. 2:13-cv-00947 (E.D. Tex. Feb. 8, 2016)

Denied
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:13-cv-00947, Dkt. No. 244
Decided
February 8, 2016
Judge
Rodney Gilstrap, J.
Document
Order
Docket Entry
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 216 Report and Recommendations, denying 185 SEALED MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment
Length
1 page

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Pending before the Court are Plaintiff’s Objections to the Report and Recommendation. (Dkt. No. 236.) The Report (Dkt. No. 216) recommended finding that Defendant was covered by a provision of an agreement between Plaintiff and T-Mobile, a third-party to this suit. The Court has reviewed the objected-to portions of the Report and Recommendation de novo and finds that the Report and Recommendation (Dkt. No. 216) should be ADOPTED. Accordingly, Plaintiff’s Objections to the Report and Recommendation (Dkt. No.