Mobile Telecommunications Technologies, LLC v. LG Electronics Mobilecomm U.S.A., Inc., No. 2:13-cv-00947 (E.D. Tex. Feb. 5, 2016)

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Pending before the Court is Defendant LG Electronics Mobilecomm U.S.A., Inc.’s (LGEMU) Motion to Strike the November 13, 2015 Expert Report of Paul Prucnal, Ph.D. Regarding Infringement of U.S. Patent No. 5,754,946 (the ’946 patent). (Dkt. No. 186.) LGEMU asserts that the Court should strike Dr. Prucnal’ s report in it s entirety. LGEMU asserts in the alternative that the Court should strike Dr. Prucnal’s report where it (1) references the reasoning in claim construction orders; or (2) relies on a “surrogate/placeholder” theory .