DataQuill Limited v. Huawei Technologies Co Ltd et al, No. 2:13-cv-00633 (E.D. Tex. Oct. 13, 2015)

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is the Renewed Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law, or Alternatively for Remittitur and/or a New Trial, Pu rsuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 50 and 59 (Dkt. No. 170 1) (“Mot.”) filed by Defendant ZTE (USA) Inc. (“ZTE”). Plaintiff DataQuill Limited (“DataQuill”) opposes the Motion. (Dkt. No. 171 (“Resp.”).) For the reasons set forth below, the Court finds that ZTE’s Motion should be DENIED as to the issues of the October 13, 1993 Priority Date, Validity of the Pa tents-in-Suit, and the alleged Erroneous Claim Constructions.