Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

DataQuill Limited v. Huawei Technologies Co Ltd et al, No. 2:13-cv-00633 (E.D. Tex. Jan. 27, 2015)

Claims Construed
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:13-cv-00633, Dkt. No. 105
Decided
January 27, 2015
Judge
Roy S. Payne, M.J.
Document
Order
Length
41 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

On November 4, 2014, the Court held an oral hearing to determine the proper construction of the disputed claim terms in U.S. Patent Nos. 6,058,304 (“‘304 Patent”); 7,139,591 (“‘591 Patent”); 7,505,785 (“‘785 Patent”); 7,920,898 (“‘898 Patent”); and 8,290,538 (“‘538 Patent”). The claim construction disputes were raised between Plaintiff DataQuill Limited and Defendants Huawei Technologies Co. Ltd., Huawei Device Co. Ltd., Hua wei Technologies USA, Inc., Huawei Device USA, Inc., Futurewei Technologies, Inc. and ZTE (USA) Inc.