Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Innovative Display Technologies LLC v. Acer Inc. et al, No. 2:13-cv-00522 (E.D. Tex. July 11, 2014)

Granted
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:13-cv-00522, Dkt. No. 85
Decided
July 11, 2014
Judge
Rodney Gilstrap, J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Length
4 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court are Defendants Acer In c., Acer America Corporation, Dell Inc., Hewlett-Packard Company, Huawei Investment and Holding Co., Ltd., Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd., Huawei Device USA Inc., BlackBerry Corporation, Black Berry Limited, and Microsoft Corporation’s (collectively, “Def endants”) Motion to Strike Expe rt Declaration in support of Plaintiff’s Claim Construction Brief. ( See Dkt. No. 72.) Having consid ered the parties’ written submissions, the Court GRANTS the motion.