Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Innovative Display Technologies LLC v. Acer Inc. et al, No. 2:13-cv-00522 (E.D. Tex. June 19, 2014)

Denied
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:13-cv-00522, Dkt. No. 71
Decided
June 19, 2014
Judge
Rodney Gilstrap, J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Length
4 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court are Defendants Acer In c., Acer America Corporation, Dell Inc., Hewlett-Packard Company, Huawei Investment and Holding Co., Ltd., Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd., Huawei Device USA Inc., BlackBerry Corporation, Black Berry Limited, and Microsoft Corporation’s (collectively, “Defendants”) Motion for Leave to Amend Invalidity Contentions (Dkt. No. 63). Having considered the parties’ written submissions, the Court DENIES the motion.