Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Light Transformation Technologies LLC v. Lighting Science Group Corporation et al, No. 2:12-cv-00826 (E.D. Tex. Aug. 23, 2014)

Denied
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:12-cv-00826, Dkt. No. 158
Decided
August 23, 2014
Judge
Roy S. Payne, M.J.
Document
Memorandum Order
Length
3 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is Defendants’ Lighting Science Group Corporation and Home Depot U.S.A. Inc.’s, Motion for Amendment to the Court’s Memorandum and Order on Claim Construction (Dkt. No. 142, filed July 25, 2014). Defendants contend that they seek limited amendments to clarify two aspects of the C ourt’s Memorandum Opinion and Order. (Dkt. No. 135, filed July 11, 2014) (“Markman Order”). After considering the arguments made by the parties (Dkt. Nos. 142 and 154), the Court finds Defendants’ motion should be DENIED. I.