Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Light Transformation Technologies LLC v. Lighting Science Group Corporation et al, No. 2:12-cv-00826 (E.D. Tex. July 11, 2014)

Claims Construed
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:12-cv-00826, Dkt. No. 135
Decided
July 11, 2014
Judge
Roy S. Payne, M.J.
Document
Claim Construction Memorandum Opinion and Order
Length
42 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

On June 18, 2014, the Court held a hearing to determine the proper construction of the disputed claim terms in United States Pa tent Nos. 8,220,959 (the “’959 Patent”) and 6,951,418 (the “’418 Patent”) (collectively, the “patents-in-suit”). After consider ing the arguments made by the parties at the hearing a nd in the parties’ claim construction briefing (Dkt. Nos. 106, 108, and 109), the Court issues this Claim Construction Memorandum and Order.