Kroy IP Holdings, LLC v. Safeway, Inc.,, No. 2:12-cv-00800 (E.D. Tex. Aug. 13, 2015)

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is Safeway’s Opposed Motion for Entry of Bill of Costs. Dk t. No. 230. For the reasons stated below, the motion is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. Rule 54(d), Fed. R. Civ. P., provides that costs should ordinarily be awarded to a prevailing party. The categories of costs that ar e awardable are set forth in the federal costs statute, 28 U.S.C.