Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Kroy IP Holdings, LLC v. Safeway, Inc.,, No. 2:12-cv-00800 (E.D. Tex. July 28, 2014)

Denied
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:12-cv-00800, Dkt. No. 141
Decided
July 28, 2014
Judge
William C. Bryson, Circuit Judge (sitting by designation)
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Length
10 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is the Defendants’ Objections to and Motion for Reconsideration of Claim Construction Memorandum Opinion and Order (Dkt. No. 108). The defendants’ motion is DENIED. On June 4, 2014, Magistrate Judge Payne issued a comprehensive claim construction order, in which he construed eight disputed terms from the claims of Kroy’s U.S. Patent No. 7,054,830 (“the ’830 patent”). Dkt. No. 90. The defendants have now sought reconsideration of seven of the court’s eight claim constructions .