DietGoal Innovations LLC v. Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc., No. 2:12-cv-00764 (E.D. Tex. Mar. 20, 2015)

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is a motion by defendant Tyson Foods, Inc., for sanctions under Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Dkt. No. 100. The motion is DENIED. I. Timeliness As an initial matter, DietGoal argues that Tyson’s motion is untimely because it was filed long after the conduct that is the subject of the motion. DietGoal points out that Tyson ’s motion asserts that DietGoal’s “Infringement Contentions have been objectively baseless since it filed its Complaint.” Dkt. No. 100, at 1 ; see also id.