DietGoal Innovations LLC v. Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc., No. 2:12-cv-00764 (E.D. Tex. Jan. 13, 2015)

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is Defendants Chipotle, Red Robin, and Subway’s Corrected Motion in Support of Their Request for an Order Taxing Disputed Costs. Dkt. No. 126. Plaintiff DietGoal Innovations LLC filed an opposition to the motion. The defendants have not filed a reply. The motion is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. Rule 54(d), Fed. R. Civ. P., provides that costs should ordinarily be awarded to a prevailing party. The categories of costs that are awardable are set forth in the federal costs statute, 28 U.S.C.