Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

TiVo Inc. v. Cisco Systems, Inc., No. 2:12-cv-00311 (E.D. Tex. Aug. 13, 2012)

Denied
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:12-cv-00311, Dkt. No. 27
Decided
August 13, 2012
Judge
Rodney Gilstrap, J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER - court DENIES Dft's Motion to Transfer
Length
4 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is Defendant Cisco Systems, Inc.’s Motion to Transfer (Dkt. No. 11). Having considered the same and for the r easons discussed below, the Court hereby DENIES the Motion to Transfer. The above-numbered action is closely relate d to two other cases pending before this Court. A brief recitation of the procedural history of these three related cases is instructive and is as follows: On August 26, 2009, Tivo Inc. (“Tivo”) sued Verizon Communications, Inc. (“Verizon”) in this Court, alleging infringement of U. S. Patent Nos.