Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

TiVo Inc. v. Cisco Systems, Inc., No. 2:12-cv-00311 (E.D. Tex. July 18, 2012)

Granted in Part
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:12-cv-00311, Dkt. No. 22
Decided
July 18, 2012
Judge
See opinion
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER signed by Judge Rodney Gilstrap on 7/18/12. Time Warner Cable will be added as a party to this case per law clark.(bas).
Length
5 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is Counterclaim Defendants Time Warner Cable Inc. and Time Warner Cable LLC’s (collectively, “TWC”) Motion to Sever and Stay Tivo’s Claims Against Time Warner Cable (Dkt. No. 110). The Court, having considered both the par ties’ briefing and oral arguments, finds that the motion should be GRANTED-IN-PART and DENIED-IN-PART as set forth below. I.