Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Mobile Telecommunications Technologies, LLC v. Clearwire Corporation, No. 2:12-cv-00308 (E.D. Tex. Jan. 29, 2014)

Granted in Part
Motions in Limine Damages Daubert / Expert Challenges
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:12-cv-00308, Dkt. No. 200
Decided
January 29, 2014
Judge
Roy S. Payne, M.J.
Document
Order
Docket Entry
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 154 Sealed Motion; granting in part and denying in part 157 Motion in Limine
Length
3 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court are Defendant's Motions in Limine (Dkt. 154) and Plaintiff’s Motions in Limine (Dkt. 157) on which the parties have not yet agreed. The Court rules as follows. MTEL’s Motions in Limine (Dkt. 157) 1. Evidence that a court has excluded Walte r Bractic’s opinions in other cases: GRANTED. The Court finds that allowing evidence that an expert has been excluded in other cases carries a significant risk of juror confusion and unfair prejudice. The cases relied upon by Clearwire are inapposite. See, e.g., Ion, Inc. v. Sercel, Inc., Case No.

Download Opinion (PDF)

Source: govinfo.gov USCOURTS collection · retrieved July 23, 2026 · Report an error

Other documents in this case