Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Optimize Technology Solutions, LLC v. Staples, Inc. et al, No. 2:11-cv-00419 (E.D. Tex. June 16, 2014)

Granted in Part
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:11-cv-00419, Dkt. No. 450
Decided
June 16, 2014
Judge
Rodney Gilstrap, J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Length
6 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is Defendants’ Motion to Compel (Dkt. No. 418), filed April 16, 2014. Defendants seek to compel production of documents and information that Plaintiff has withheld on the basis of attorney -client privilege; Defendants dispute that the privilege applies. Havin g considered the matter, the Court finds that Defendants’ motion should be and hereby is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART for the reasons set forth below. I. FACTUAL BACKGROUND Plaintiff Optimize Technology Solutions, LLC (“Optimize”) owns U.S. Patent No.