Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Optimize Technology Solutions, LLC v. Staples, Inc. et al, No. 2:11-cv-00419 (E.D. Tex. Nov. 20, 2013)

Claims Construed
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:11-cv-00419, Dkt. No. 269
Decided
November 20, 2013
Judge
Rodney Gilstrap, J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Length
103 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court are Plaintiff Optimize Technology Solutions, LLC’s Markman Brief (Dkt. No. 217), the response of Defendants Dillard’s, Inc., drugstore.com, Inc., Staples, Inc., J.C. Penney Company, Inc., J.C. Penney Corporation, Inc., HSN, Inc., and Recreational Equipment, Inc. (collectively, “Defendants”) (Dkt. No. 229), and Plaintiff’s reply (Dkt. No. 235). Further before the Court is supplemental briefing filed by Defendants (Dkt. No. 261) and Plaintiff (Dkt. No.