Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Microchip Technology, Inc., et al v. United Module Corp. et al, No. 2:11-cv-00332 (E.D. Tex. July 7, 2011)

Granted
Venue / Transfer Motion to Dismiss
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:11-cv-00332, Dkt. No. 83
Decided
July 7, 2011
Judge
See opinion
Document
Order
Docket Entry
AMENDED ORDER (redacted public version) Granting Defendants' Motions to Transfer in Related Cases: 5:10-cv-04241-LHK; 5:10-cv-05290-LHK; 5:10-cv-05196-LHK; and 5:11-cv-00430-LHK. The June 9, 2011 Order 77 is vacated. The motion for leave to…
Length
16 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS TO TRANSFER 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 United States District Court For the Northern District of California UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION MICROCHIP TECHNOLOGY, INC. and SILICON STORAGE TECHNOLOGY, INC., Plaintiffs, v. UNITED MODULE CORP., and KERANOS, LLC, Defendants.

Download Opinion (PDF)

Source: govinfo.gov USCOURTS collection · retrieved July 23, 2026 · Report an error

Other documents in this case