Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Microchip Technology, Inc., et al v. United Module Corp. et al, No. 2:11-cv-00332 (E.D. Tex. Oct. 14, 2010)

Granted
General / Procedural
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:11-cv-00332, Dkt. No. 11
Decided
October 14, 2010
Judge
Joseph C. Spero, J.
Document
Order
Docket Entry
STIPULATION AND ORDER RE: EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT
Length
2 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION RE EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT CASE NO. CV-10-4241 (JCS) JAMES C. OTTESON, State Bar No. 157781 jim@agilityiplaw.com MONICA MUCCHETTI ENO, State Bar No. 164107 monica@agilityiplaw.com AGILITY IP LAW 1900 University Circle, Suite 201 East Palo Alto, CA 94303 Telephone: (650) 227-4800 Facsimile: (650) 318-3483 Attorneys for Defendants UNITED MODULE CORP.

Download Opinion (PDF)

Source: govinfo.gov USCOURTS collection · retrieved July 23, 2026 · Report an error

Other documents in this case