Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

TQP Development LLC vs v. 1-800-Flowers.com Inc et al, No. 2:11-cv-00248 (E.D. Tex. Nov. 3, 2015)

Denied
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:11-cv-00248, Dkt. No. 469
Decided
November 3, 2015
Judge
Rodney Gilstrap, J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Length
11 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is Defendant Newegg , Inc. ’s (“Newegg”) Rule 50(b) Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law, limited to the issue of damages ( “Mot.”, Dkt. No. 436). The Court has already addressed the portions of Defendant’s Motion dealing with infringement (Dkt. No. 461) and invalidity (Dkt. No. 464). For the reasons set forth below, Newegg’s Rule 50(b) Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law is DENIED as to damages. I. BACKGROUND The Court held a jury trial in this case , and the jury entered a verdict on November 25, 2013.