Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

TQP Development LLC vs v. 1-800-Flowers.com Inc et al, No. 2:11-cv-00248 (E.D. Tex. July 19, 2013)

Denied
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:11-cv-00248, Dkt. No. 290
Decided
July 19, 2013
Judge
Roy S. Payne, M.J.
Document
Memorandum Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM ORDER denying motion #174 to compel. The parties are directed to meet and confer on the expenses and, if the matter is not resolved beforehand, Plaintiff shall file a motion to fix expenses within 21 days
Length
2 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

The Defendants’ Motion to Compel Discovery (Dkt. No. 174) came before the Court for hearing on July 19, 2013. The Motion was filed by Defendants HSN, Inc. and Newegg, Inc. on February 12, 2013. The Motion was set for hearing by Notice entered on July 3, 2013. Defendant HSN, Inc. was dismissed from the case on July 9, 2013, and on July 11, 2013 Defendant Newegg withdrew the part of the Motion dealing with the first issue set out in the Motion. (Dkt. No. 284).