Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Wi-Lan Inc. v. HTC Corporation et al, No. 2:11-cv-00068 (E.D. Tex. July 17, 2013)

Denied
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:11-cv-00068, Dkt. No. 445
Decided
July 17, 2013
Judge
Rodney Gilstrap, J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Length
19 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

I. INTRODUCTION Pending before the Court is the Defendants’ Motion to Sever and Transfer Venue to United States District Court for the S outhern District of California (D kt. No. 130) and Sierra Wireless America, Inc.’s Supplemental Motion to Sever and Transfer Venue to United States District Court for the Southern District of California (Dkt. No. 144). The Court held a hearing on December 14, 2012 and heard argument on both motions. The Moving Defendants 1 seek to sever Exedea, Inc.