Wi-Lan Inc. v. HTC Corporation et al, No. 2:11-cv-00068 (E.D. Tex. June 27, 2012)

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

I. INTRODUCTION Pending before the Court is Defendants HTC Corporation , HTC America, Inc. and Exedea, Inc.’s (collective, “HTC” or “Defendants”) motion to transfer venue. HTC contends that the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington is a more convenient forum than the Eastern District of Texas and seek s to transfer venue pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a). The Court, having considered the venue motion, the related briefing, and oral argument of counsel, DENIES HTC’s motion to transfer venu e.